Bringing together leading scholars of war from across Australia, this project explores the experiences of Australian service personnel and veterans who, from the First World War to today, have challenged the warrior mythology of the Anzac Legend. It asks:
How have serving military personnel and veterans challenged war, militarisation, and warrior mythology, both through political activism and in their personal lives?
How have Australian military institutions worked to elide and erase serving personnel and veterans who challenge the Anzac warrior mythology?
What do these histories suggest for current and future Australian military personnel who challenge Anzac warrior mythology?
Kate Ariotti and Martin Crotty are both historians at the University of Queensland and have been long-time collaborators. Martin has previously published on Australian masculinity and militarism, Australian war memory and its implications, the Returned and Services League and veterans. Kate’s research has centred on the experiences of Australian POW in both world wars, and she is currently working on an ARC-funded history of the Australian war corpse.
Kate and Martin's contribution to Challenging Anzac flows from a joint project examining the stories and experiences of the 115 Australian soldiers who were sentenced to death in the First World War. Through life and death of Private Nicholas Permakoff, a Russian conscript in a famously volunteer Australian Army, they explore one of the most remarkable and least distinguished records of any soldier in the Australian forces, tracing the unfortunate journey that left Permakoff dead, disgraced and dishonoured.
Kate Ariotti
Martin Crotty
Alistair Thomson
Alistair Thomson is a world-leading oral historian who has published widely on war memory, myth, and oral history theory and practice. His book Anzac Memories: Living with the Legend (1994) was a landmark study on Australian war experience. Thomson is Emeritus Professor of History at Monash University and served as President of the International Oral History Association and of Oral History Australia.
In the 1980s, Al interviewed twenty-four working class veterans of the First World War. He discovered that not all working class veterans felt proud of their war service. Contrary to the Anzac legend of fierce, resourceful fighters, these diggers remembered fear and reluctance to fight. They felt powerless, comparing themselves to pawns on the chessboard or cogs in the war machine. Al found multiple instances of desertion, refusal, as well as quieter resistance among the working class ranks. Through his work, Al argues that rather than speaking to an Anzac legend of warfare, these diggers' memories reflect a universal experience of war.
John Maynard is a Worimi Aboriginal man from the Port Stephens region of New South Wales and Emeritus Professor at the University of Newcastle. He gained his PhD in 2003, examining the rise of early Aboriginal political activism. He has worked with and within many Aboriginal communities, urban, rural and remote. Professor Maynard’s publications have concentrated on the intersections of Aboriginal political and social history, and the history of Australian race relations. He is the author of several books, including Aboriginal Stars of the Turf, Fight for Liberty and Freedom, The Aboriginal Soccer Tribe, Aborigines and the Sport of Kings, True Light and Shade and Living with the Locals.
John's contribution to 'Challenging Anzac' explores Aboriginal experiences of the First World War and its impact upon the rise of organised Aboriginal political revolt during the 1920s. Aboriginal servicemen from the Great War suffered from racism, exclusion and resentment on their return to Australia. Some of these men were driven to political agitation for Aboriginal rights and joined the Australian Aboriginal Progressive Association (AAPA), the first united all Aboriginal political organisation to form in Australia. The AAPA were eventually harassed, hounded and smashed out of existence by a coalition of the Aborigines Protection Board, the missionaries, and the police.
John Maynard
Bobbie Oliver
Bobbie Oliver is an Honorary Research Fellow at The University of Western Australia and Director of the Centre for Western Australian History. She taught History at Curtin University from 1997 to 2018 and prior to that was a Research Officer at the Australian War Memorial in Canberra. Her most recent book is Peacemongers. Australian resistance to war and military conscription, 1885 to 1945 (Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars, 2024).
In the immediate aftermath of the First World War, one group of veterans challenged the warrior mythology that returned soldiers were politically and socially conservative and that when they resorted to acts of violence, these acts were always against striking unionists or adherents of Left political movements. Focussing on a group of Western Australian returned soldiers, who espoused Socialist rhetoric and whose sympathies lay with the labour movement, Bobbie shows how returned soldiers supported striking workers, most notably the Fremantle wharfies in May 1919, with Edwin Corboy stating that he would “rather have fought on the wharf than for the capitalists in the Big War”. They objected to the RSL’s conservative political bias, accusing the organisation of siding with the capitalist class and its violent acts were against strike breakers. The events and rhetoric show that for a period in 1919–1920 in Western Australia, a group of returned men challenged the RSL’s right to speak on their behalf.
Nathan Hobby is a biographer who has worked extensively on the lives of the Throssell family in Western Australia. He is the author of a biography of Hugo Throssell’s wife, Katharine Susannah Prichard, The Red Witch (Miegunyah Press 2022), which won the 2023 WA Premier’s Award for Book of the Year. The biography expands on his PhD thesis about Prichard and includes a re-examination of the life and politics of Throssell.
Nathan's contribution explores how Victoria Cross winner Hugo Throssell became a 'celebrity Anzac' after the First World War. Throssell’s Bolshevism is shown to be a short-lived phase in a period of revolutionary expectation and the initial idealism of his marriage. Instead of experiencing outright rejection, Throssell was denied opportunities to speak publicly even while he continued to be included in ceremonies and his warrior feats were celebrated in the media. The representation of Hugo Throssell in his own time and ours shows the smoothing over and silencing of a challenge to the warrior mythology of the Anzac legend.
Nathan Hobby
Meggie Hutchinson
Karen Bird
Margaret Hutchinson and Karen Bird are scholars working on a history of veteran suicide in Australia. Meggie is an historian in the School of Humanities and Social Sciences at UNSW Canberra, researching the policies and practices of care for Australian veterans and the cultural legacies of war. Karen is Deputy Chair for the National Advisory Committee for Open Arms: Veterans & Families Counselling and a Board Member at the Australian War Memorial.
Meggie and Karen argue that understanding how veteran suicide was understood in the past can help to improve program outcomes for current and future service personnel. Their contribution focuses on select case studies of veteran suicide after the First World War, exploring how veterans navigated civilian life and how their families and communities came to understand their trauma. Their work provides insight into the enduring cost of the war by examining the stories of men whose lived experience challenges the conventional codes of masculinity enshrined in the Anzac legend.
Jason Smeaton a social historian of Australian servicewomen. His forthcoming book, Nursing Aids at War (Cambridge University Press), examines the gendered experience of women who served in the Australian Army as nursing orderlies during the Second World War. is forthcoming with Cambridge University Press. Jason currently works as a Historian with the Australian Army History Unit and is a Visiting Fellow at UNSW Canberra. He continues to research and publish on Australian women’s history with particular focus on feminist issues and women’s history of the Australian Army.
Jason's contribution to Challenging Anzac explores how Australian women who joined the military during the Second World War felt about their service and the war. Placed in positions that emphasised contemporary gender-based understandings of socially acceptable roles for women, such as clerks, telephonists, and, of course, nurses and nursing aids, they were were continuously reminded by the military authorities of their difference from the esteemed male soldier. Service women’s ambiguous position in the military prompted their opposition towards war and the military and led to a sense of disillusionment which, though often expressed privately and without public agitation, deeply affected their service experience and identification as a veteran after the war.
Jason Smeaton
Max Billington
Max Billington is a PhD candidate (History) at Deakin University. They are researching the role of Australian military personnel in the British nuclear testing in Australia and the Australian government’s use of warrior mythology and biopolitics to control the representation of and deny recognition to so-called “nuclear servicemen” within the nation’s military history.
Between 1952 and 1957, the Australian military provided support to five major test series of nuclear weapons built and owned by the British government. In the 1970s, Australia's "nuclear veterans" accused the government of exposing them to harmful radiation during their service and fought for compensation. Yet the Australian government has been hesitant to acknowledge that the tasks performed by the nuclear veterans was military service, worthy of the recognition and compensation provided under the veterans’ benefits scheme, instead classing them as "participants". The exclusion of “nuclear veterans” from Australian warrior mythology and the corresponding erasure of soldiers’ physical bodies from Australian nuclear history illustrates how harms suffered by “nuclear veterans” are highly inconvenient for the state’s traditional portrayal of bodily harm in combat as fulfilling a citizen’s duty to protect the nation.
Mia Martin Hobbs is an oral historian of war and conflict, with a research focus on the Vietnam War, War on Terror, gender, peace, security, and post-war reconciliation. She has written on anti-war activism among US veterans in Journal of American History and the impact of the Anzac Revival on Australian veterans’ war memory in Australian Journal of Politics & History.
Mia's contribution to Challenging Anzac explores the stories of Australian veterans who attempted to protest war and the ways in which they have been undermined, from Vietnam to the War on Terror. Drawing on oral histories with Australian Vietnam veterans, public letters and articles from veterans, as well as online forums, blogs, and social media pages from more recent wars, her research reveals how veterans have opposed war and militarism, and explores signs of hesitancy, refusal, and intimidation in their memories of dissent.
Mia Martin Hobbs
Ben Wadham
Ben Wadham is an Army veteran and now Professor of Defence and Veteran Studies at Flinders University in South Australia. Ben has researched the ‘dark side of defence’ for over two decades. His research focuses on how the ADF use technologies of cultural camouflage to justify nefarious war policy while still celebrating the ideal of the Anzac warrior – a man of integrity, courage and justice. Ben has pioneered research on military institutional abuse in Australia and is currently leading a national study on veteran suicidality 1914 until the present.
The principle image of the Australian soldier is that of the Anzac, a larrikin with high integrity, just mind, and a willingness and capability to service Australia. Yet soldiers who exhibit these qualities are punished by the contemporary Australian Defence Force. Ben's research explores the experiences of Lt Col Lance Collins, former Army intelligence officer, head of the Timor Leste Desk during INTERFET operations around the turn of the century. Collins encountered a conflict between the reality of atrocities on the ground in Timor Leste and the narrative of the security crisis promoted by the Jakarta Lobby and the Howard government. In attempting to draw attention to the intelligence that contradicted the government line, Collins was denigrated and marginalised by the Australian military. His story highlights that the Australian defence force does not recognise or value the qualities of Anzac, instead prizing subservience and obedience.
Bianca Baggiarini
Joan Beaumont
Bianca Baggiarini and Joan Beaumont are researching how the Anzac legend can coexist with autonomous warfare. Joan is an internationally recognized historian of Australia in the two world wars, Australian defence and foreign policy, the history of prisoners of war and the memory and heritage of war. Bianca is a political sociologist researching the social, political, and ethical justifications and effects of remote and autonomous systems (RAS). Her forthcoming book, Governing Military Sacrifice: Privatization, Drones, and the Future of War (University of Toronto Press) analyses how drones and military privatization together reveal the breakdown of the citizen-soldier archetype and its links to sacrificial cults and idioms.
Key to the Anzac legend are notions of courage, endurance, mateship, and the trope of sacrifice, yet it is unclear whether these aspects of the Anzac legend will survive the next “revolution” in technology of war: namely, the growing dominance of autonomous warfare, and whether it will be possible in the future to speak of ‘an automated warrior.’ Bianca and Joan's analysis of recent techno-centric ADF recruitment campaigns and specific weapons acquisitions, including the MQ-28A Ghost Bat, a ‘loyal wingman’ uncrewed vessel, reveals that the ADF is increasingly moving toward a disembodied and disembodying approach to war. This will have consequences for the Anzac legend, and how it practically survives in the contemporary moment, given its emphasis on embodied warrior traits.
Carolyn Holbrook
Carolyn Holbrook is the author of Anzac: The Unauthorised Biography which made the shortlist for NSW Premier History Award 2015 in the category of Australian First World War History. She is associate professor in history in the Centre for Contemporary Histories at Deakin University, and Director of Australian Policy and History, which connects historical evidence to contemporary political and social issues.
What lies behind the enduring power of group mythologies, such as the Anzac legend? In arguing that current explanations that prioritise the propaganda efforts of the state are inadequate, Carolyn draws from sociology, anthropology and evolutionary psychology to show how the mythology of Anzac has served to foster social cooperation and group cohesion within the national community of Australia. In understanding the emergence of Anzac and the abiding power of its rituals through a framework that incorporates scientific and social-scientific understandings, we can gain greater insight into human social behaviour in a range of contexts, at a time when longstanding explanations appear to be redundant.